Saturday, November 7, 2015

U.S. Military Policy: Resource Guide






U.S. Military / Climate Change / Primary Sources

The White House. (2015). Findings from Select Federal Reports: National Security Implications of Climate Change. Retrieved from https://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/default/files/docs/National_Security_Implications_of_Changing_Climate_Final_051915.pdf
This very recent synthesis and summary, from the White House, of a variety of major sources cited below eloquently sums up the threat that climate change poses to security of the United States of America. The report summarizes the domestic and international security implications of climate change while predicting the demands it will place on military resources. The White House concludes its findings with a pledge, that the U.S. is preparing with strong resilience measures in order to address the changing dynamics of a warming planet.   

America’s Climate Choices: Panel on Advancing the Science of Climate Change, National Research Council (2010). Advancing the Science of Climate Change. Washington D.C., The National American Press. Retrieved from http://site.ebrary.com/lib/csbsju/reader.action?docID=10439400&ppg=1
This text, under the technical chapters in part II, chapter 16, explains the relationship between climate and national security in terms of military operations and international relations. Also within chapter 16 there is a portion dedicated to the prospect of binding international agreements under treaty verification. Additionally, the relationship between climate change and human security is discussed in a broader sense which is followed by future research needs of the U.S. military concerning climate change.

America’s Climate Choices: Panel on Advancing the Science of Climate Change, National Research Council (2010). Adapting to the Impacts of Climate Change. Washington DC, USA: The National American Press. Retrieved from http://site.ebrary.com/lib/csbsju/reader.action?docID=10439397&ppg=17
In this text book, under Rationale and mechanisms for global engagement in climate change adaption (chapter 6), various issues of U.S. National Security are covered. Rationale for U.S. engagement in adaption to climate change at the global scale are discussed in depth. The issues consist of global unrest brought on by a lack of necessary resource availability which could lead to future armed conflicts. A decrease in water quality and supply are mentioned as specific threat multipliers that the U.S. military will face for decades to come. The text also mentions the need of the military to act as a global first responder to natural disasters, which will only increase with more sever are and unpredictable weather anomalies.

Barnett, J. (2003). Security and Climate Change. Global Environmental Change, 13, 7-17. Retrieved from
This article explores the ranges of possible connections between climate change and national security. In doing so, it looks at human security concerns and future military roles under the assumption that climate change may trigger violent conflict. This peer-reviewed paper also dives into discussion of both mitigation and adaption of climate change. Overall this source provides evidence to why climate change is a national security issue.  

Busby, J. (2015). Climate Change and National Security. US Army Research, Development and Engineering Command, ADA613137, 1-17.
This paper comes from the Strauss Center for International Security and Law at the University of Texas at Austin. It was written under the CCAPS (Climate Change and African Political Stability) program which is funded by the DoD’s Minerva Initiative. The initiative is a university-based, social science research program focused on areas of strategic importance to national security policy. In the paper, basic questions are answered, such as does climate change constitute a national security threat to the U.S. and how do the U.S. security and academic communities describe the security implications of climate change? This source also provides science, U.S. Military and Intelligence community, think tank, academic and CCAPS resources for further study.

Campbell, K. M. (2008). Climatic Cataclysm: The Foreign Policy and National Security. Washington D.C., Brookings Institution Press. Retrieved from   http://site.ebrary.com/lib/csbsju/reader.action?docID=10338437&ppg=1
This book gives a compressive perspective about national security and climate change. Within the text, various predictions of future national security consequences of climate change are made. The source also provides a detailed history of the U.S.’s DoD redefining security beyond the cold war and the long-standing debate concerning redefinition. The question what can be done? Is also pondered, in terms of global cooperation to combat climate change extensively in subsequent chapters.

Dale, C. (2014). The 2014 Quadrennial Defense Review (QDR) and Defense Strategy: Issues for Congress. Congressional Research Service, Retrieved from http://fas.org/sgp/crs/natsec/R43403.pdf
Section 118, Title 10 of U.S. Code requires the Department of Defense (DoD) to submit a report to congress concerning its most recent QDR process no later than when the President has to submit his budget request for that particular fiscal year. The purpose of this report is to “delineate a national defense strategy” for the U.S. and provide insight to the necessary steps to be taken in order to implement such a strategy.

Daniels et al. (2015). U.S. Department of Energy: National Strategy for the Artic Region (NSAR) – Ten Year Renewable Energy Plan, Office of Indian Energy, Retrieved from
NSAR gives insight into the U.S. government’s “strategic priorities for the artic region.” Such priorities put the U.S. in a place to take full advantage of “emerging opportunities” that will be presenting themselves in the following ten years, in terms of renewable energy. This effort displays the areas for federal agency engagement in order to increase renewable energy along with overall energy efficiency in the artic region.

Donley, M. B. (2010). Air Force Energy Plan. Air Force for Installations, Environment and Logistics & Office of Primary Responsibility, Retrieved from
This plan serves as the framework for all Air Force personnel in communicating Air Force energy objectives. This plan not only lays out the action steps for the Air Force to reach these objectives, but also specifies the command responsible for executing each phase.

Executive Office of the President (2014). National Security Strategy. Retrieved from http://oai.dtic.mil/oai/oai?verb=getRecord&metadataPrefix=html&identifier=ADA616357
This paper from the President outlines the strategic position that the U.S. is currently engaged in at this moment concerning national security. This ambitious agenda, concerning many other issues than just global warming, put forth by the President will take many presidencies to fully implement.

Fitzgerald, E. K. & Cordesman, A. H. & Arleigh, A. (2009). The 2010 Quadrennial Defense Review. Center for Strategies & International Studies. Retrieved from http://csis.org/files/publication/090809_qdrahc_revised.pdf
This working draft of the 2010 quadrennial defense review is written to develop new policies, capabilities and initiatives of the U.S. Department of defense. Although past defense reviews have been followed by a “strategy-reality gap” in the past, there is a greater concern for real policy to be enacted in terms of climate change mitigation.  The 2010 QDR has the potential to be the next step in reform processes to the current path the U.S. military is heading down, in the context of military spending in relation to climate change.

Greenert, J. W. (2009). US Navy Arctic Roadmap. Task Force Climate Change / Oceanographer of the Navy, Retrieved from
Science shows that anthropogenic climate change is being most felt in the artic regions. Because the “artic is primarily a maritime environment” the Navy bases its policies, strategies, force structure and investment on it the attic’s ever changing state. This roadmap will be updated and refined to correctly follow all subsequent QDRs.

Greenert. J. W. (2014). The United States Navy Arctic Roadmap for 2014 to 2030. Task Force Climate Change, Retrieved from
This policy plan, put forth by the U.S. Navy is in response to the opening for the Arctic Ocean and the impact this has on national security implications and future naval capabilities. These future naval responses will be based out of the state of the Alaska and the surrounding arctic region, in partnership with Canada. The purpose of Task Force Climate in the Navy is to better understand the changing environment of the arctic region.

Hayden, T. J. et al. (2013). Department of the Army: High-level Climate Change Vulnerability Assessment. U.S. Army Corp of Engineers, Retrieved from
This report was prepared by the Engineer Research Development Center for the Office of the Assistant Secretary of the Army. The objective or purpose of this report is to provide the Assistant Secretary with a broad overview of potential vulnerabilities of various Army installations to climate change. Ultimately, the report will be used to inform Army leadership and planners, at all levels in charge of installation management, of climate change impacts on training, operations and facilities.

Houser, T. & Hsaing, S. & Kopp, R. & Larsen, K. (2015). Economic Risks of Climate Change: An American Prospectus. New York. Columbia University Press. Retrieved from https://books.google.com/books?id=0QTSBgAAQBAJ&pg=PA190&dq=us+military/climate+change&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0CEQQ6AEwA2oVChMIlamLq-zTyAIViXceCh01nArL#v=onepage&q&f=false
 Under the unquantified impacts of climate change in part 4 of the text, chapter 20 is titled national security. This chapter unpacks the ideas of how the U.S. military plans for contingencies in the future, all while keeping in mind indirect international impacts, amidst the uncertainty of the effects of anthropogenic climate change. This chapter begins with an excellent quote from General Gordon Sullivan describing that waiting for 100% certainty before action is not the way of soldiers before battle and therefore should not be the way of the American public.

Justice, N. G. & Vane, M. A. & Stevenson, M. H. (2010). Power and Energy Strategy White Paper. Army Capabilities Integration Center – Research, Development and Engineering Command, Retrieved from
The paper provides an outline of power an energy capabilities that support the Army’s needs in both the near and long-term. “Considering the complexity of modern military systems and operational environments, there is no reason to a ‘silver-bullet’ solution.” The authors of this paper, instead suggest the implementation of incremental improvements in power and energy density and efficiency through the pursuit of a variety of options.

Kelly, J. V. (2013). Department of Homeland Security: FEMA’s Initial Response in New York to Hurricane Sandy. Office of Inspector General, Retrieved from https://www.oig.dhs.gov/assets/Mgmt/2013/OIG_13-124_Sep13.pdf
Report summarizing the initial response from the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) to the impacts of Hurricane Sandy in New York from November 2012 to May 2013. This report does not include any recommendations in terms of an after action review for FEMA, rather it simply summarizes the audit that took place of FEMA officials during the time they initially dealt with the crisis. The results of the audit are as follows, “FEMA provided an effective and efficient response to the damages caused by Hurricane Sandy.”

Kendall, F. (2014). Department of Defense Strategic Sustainability Performance Plan FY 2014. Office of the Deputy Under Secretary of Defense for Installations and Environment, Retrieved from
This is an annual report of the DoD SSPP which lays out the DoD’s plan for sustainability through the fiscal year 2020. This plan addresses climate change because of its impact on national security. The DoD seeks to withstand a ready and resilient force that will be able to respond to global instability, the opening of the arctic and increasing sea level storm surges near coastal installations. In the past, the DoD has made improvements on reducing greenhouse gas emissions, facility energy and water consumption, petroleum based fuel and solid waste. In the short term, its goals include pursuing renewable energies, researching more about the impacts of climate change and sustainable procurement. The overall objective of the DoD’s SSPP is to promote sustainability in the everyday fabric of the DoD mission going into the future.

Longstein, K. & Pimpedly, J. (2014). Peace Corps Climate Change Adaptation Plan. Retrieved from http://files.peacecorps.gov/multimedia/pdf/policies/2014_Climate_Change_Adaptation_Plan.pdf
This policy plan is designed to preserve the Peace Corps mission in the midst of a changing climate. The Peace Corps’ mission, concerning climate change, is to “provide leadership in enhancing programs that build capacity and strengthen resilience among the most vulnerable countries where volunteers serve.” To do so, it aims to integrate adaptation into all parts of its operations, both at home and abroad which include country post logistics and services. 

Lozar, R. C. & Hiett, M. D. & Westervelt, J. D. & Weahterly J. W. (2011). Anticipating Climate Change Impacts on Army Installations. Champaign, Illinois: Engineer Research and Development Center – Construction Engineering Research Lab. Retrieved from http://oai.dtic.mil/oai/oai?verb=getRecord&metadataPrefix=html&identifier=ADA559185  
As climate change leads to habitat change, there will also be changes to training sites on U.S. Army Instillations. This report explores how results from global climate models can aid in the forecasting challenges to habitats and species while also estimating potential effects on erosion at all 130 continental U.S. installations. This is key because both the Federal government’s requirements regarding the maintenance of threatened species and erosion will have a major impact on military training operations in the future. The purpose of this report is to provide insight into the probable changes of operations that will be required for the instillations to carry on their responsibilities to stay mission capable in the future.  

Lute, J. H. (2012). Department of Homeland Security Climate Change Adaptation Roadmap. Retrieved from https://www.dhs.gov/sites/default/files/publications/Appendix%20A%20DHS%20FY2012%20Climate%20Change%20Adaptation%20Plan_0.pdf
This CCA roadmap from the DHS is in response to a government mandate, back in 2009, requiring all federal departments to comply with U.S. government’s efforts to develop a national CCA strategy. This particular roadmap consists of 42 identified actions which seek to ensure security, resilience and customs and exchange with the world across all care mission areas in the face of climate change. Overall, there are four strategic objectives of the DHS, manage climate change risks (17 actions), protect and ensure resilience of critical infrastructure and key resources (CIKR) (5 actions), ensure nation’s resilience to more frequent or extreme weather events and natural disasters (8 actions), and contribute to safety, stability, security and environmental protection in the arctic (12 actions).

Napolitano, J. (2013). Department of Homeland Security Climate Action Plan. Community and Infrastructure Resilience Working Group, Retrieved from http://www.dhs.gov/sites/default/files/publications/DHS%20Climate%20Action%20Plan.pdf
This climate change action plan is broken into three sections, the history of climate change adaptation (CCA) at DHS, aligning with the president’s action plan, and action steps that the DHS plan to implement. The overall purpose of these annual reports from the DHS are to “evaluate agency climate change risks and vulnerabilities to manage the efforts of climate change on the agency’s operations and mission in both the short and the long term.” Then audience of these plans are the American public, policy makers, stakeholders and heads of both I/NGOs. 

Office for the Deputy under Secretary of Defense (2014). Department of Defense 2014 Climate Change Adaptation Roadmap. Installations and Environment. Retrieved from
Climate change will affect the Department of Defense’s ability to defend the Nation and poses immediate risks to U.S. national security. In this military plan of action, the department of defense is responding to climate change in two ways, adaption and mitigation. Throughout the roadmap, adaption is covered in depth, while mitigation is not. This document contains very progressive statements concerning climate change from top military leaders and Chuck Hagel himself. This policy framework for climate change adaption planning is formatted in terms of three major adaption goals which are fleshed out under four categories, plans and operations, training and testing, built and national infrastructure, and acquisition and supply chain.

Office for the Deputy under Secretary of Defense (2012). Department of Defense 2014 Climate Change Adaptation Roadmap. Installations and Environment. Retrieved from
This brief goes hand in hand with the 2012 climate adaption roadmap from the homeland security. Much of this document is founded upon the principles of the QDRs which are issued by the Secretary of Defense. The four broad goals of the DoD is to define a coordinating body to address climate change, utilize robust decision making approaches, by in climate change considerations into pre-existing processes and partner with other governmental agencies to overcome the challenges of climate change. Throughout this paper are a variety of impactful quotes of both heads of government and military concerning the risks that climate change pose for this nation’s future.

Papp, R. J. (2013). U.S. Coast Guard Operational Sustainability Performance Plan. Department of Homeland Security, Retrieved from
Because the main goal of the U.S. Coast Guard is to protect America’s marine and coastal environment, they have great interest in promoting sustainability in maritime regions. In this plan, there are a variety of SMART goals under the following categories; facilities progress towards statutory requirements, communications system and navigational aid greenhouse gas reduction and shipboard greenhouse gas reductions. This plan, along with plans from other branches, are largely in response to the President’s Executive Oder 13514 “Federal Leadership in Environmental Energy, and Economic Performance.” This EO sets a variety of sustainability goals for Federal Agencies to improve upon environmental, energy and economic performance in a measureable way. 

Papp, R. J. (2013). U.S. Coast Guard Artic Strategy – Vision for Operating in the Artic Region: Ensure safe, secure, and environmentally responsible maritime activity in the Artic. Retrieved from
This strategy begins with a brief overview of the interaction that the U.S. has played in the Arctic region form shipping and transit to oil production and natural resources. Since maritime activity is increasing as the Arctic ice rereads, it is crucial that all institutions that directly interact with this region continually update their strategies for sustainable development. This plan has an operational horizon of ten years and consists of improving awareness of the Arctic region, modernizing governance of the Arctic region and broadening partnerships of organizations that have direct influence over the Arctic region.

Ragnhild, N. & Gleditsch, N. P. (2007). Climate Change and Conflict. Political Geography, 26, 627-638.
Climate change is widely expected to exacerbate resources, causing future armed conflicts. Social scientists are now beginning to investigate the security concerns of climate change more systematically. This source also contains a very rich list of references that provide a multitude of case studies of how resource scarcity has brought on armed conflict, especially lack of water availability in the Middle East.

Reichert, J. & Cuttino, P. & Lightbody, L. & Lubetsky, J. F. (2010). Reenergizing America’s Defense: How the Armed Forces are Stepping Forward to Combat Climate Change and Improve the U.S. Energy Posture, The Pew Project on National Security, Energy and Climate, Retrieved from
This document from the Pew Project begins with a letter to the American public from retired Senator John W. Warner. In it, he gives a very insightful background into the history of U.S. military involvement with dealing with climate change over the past decade. In the report that follows details many of the initiatives of the DoD concerning climate change and the military’s “energy posture.” Because “energy and the way we use it are far-reaching national security issues” it’s no wonder how climate change has also becomes classified as a national security risk.

Riddle, K. W. (2014). U.S. National Artic Strategy: Preparing Defensive Lines of Effort for the Artic. National Defense University Norfolk Va. Joint Forces Staff College. Retrieved from
This paper provides a strategic assessment of the Arctic, from the DoD perspective, and lends recommendations to top military officials to prepare defensive lines of effort, should they be needed in 10-15 years or beyond. This paper is in response to increase of economic opportunities in the Arctic and the U.S. lack of the infrastructure, command and control and Arctic-capable assets to meet national strategic objectives. Since 2009, the U.S. has progressively released strategic documents outlining the U.S. interests and national objectives in the Arctic. These documents do not adequately address all the strategic risks at stake in the Arctic and do not provide clear guidance to the DoD for defensive lines of effort. The U.S. strategic approach to the Arctic is that of accepting the current stable and conflict free Arctic region as remaining the same in the future. This strategic approach is adequate for the near term; however, it lacks specific guidance to DoD on how to prepare for possible conflict in the future. Recent events involving Russia in the Ukraine and China in the South China Sea provide historical context to the willingness of nations to use military means to defend their national interests. Without adequate defensive posturing, competition over Arctic resources could become the first direct existential threat to U.S. sovereignty.

Rogers, W. (2010). Promoting the Dialogue: Climate Change and America’s Air Forces. Center for a New American Security: Strong, Pragmatic and Principled National Security and Defense Policies, Retrieved from
This working paper outlines the significant changes that climate change would impose on future U.S. Air Force missions around the world. Both the Air Force and the Navy, in particular, are assessing their short and long term energy strategies in order to mitigate the effects of climate change. Because climate change has the potential to change operating and strategic environments, it is classified as a threat multiplier for the U.S. Air Force and other services branches. As of now, however, analysts have not adequately explored what effects climate change could have on the U.S. Air Forces specifically.

Salem, A. & King, C. & Fox, S. & Haley, R. & Klotzbach, M. (2009). Best Practices in the Navy’s Energy Programs: Strategic Communication Factors Operating in the Tactical Forces. Center for Defense Management Research, Retrieved form
This document from the Center for Defense Management Research reviews past documents of existing Navy energy conservation programs in order to provide critique to those practices. A wide variety of Navy tactical forces’ personnel were also interviewed regarding their insights into effectiveness of current programs. The recommendations to the head policy makers in the Navy include, but are not limited to, expanding and improving existing programs, tailoring communication themes between programs, further development of risk communication plans, designing a process for evaluating conservation capabilities and to support an integrated schematic communications process.

Salehyan, I. (2008). From Climate Change to Conflict? No Consensus Yet. Journal of Peace Research, 45(3), 315-326
This article challenges the view that climate change and scarcity of resources will directly impact future political violence. It instead focuses on the effects of climate change on armed conflicts while taking into consideration a variety of political and social variables to better understand where and when conflicts are likely to occur. Afterwards, the article discusses methods to improve future research on the climate change-conflict connection. It also gives broad suggestions for policy makers.

Smith, P. (2007). Climate Change, Mass Migration and the Military Response. Elsevier/Foreign Policy Research Institute, 51(4), 617-633.
This paper focuses on the U.S. military response to various weather disasters, like Hurricane Katrina, as case studies that can be used to predict how the military will react to natural disasters around the world in decades to come. In the context of the emerging century’s international migration, there is much speculation to what role the U.S. military will play in aiding in the relocation of “climate change refugees.”

The White House. (2013). The President’s Climate Action Plan. Executive Officer of the President, Retrieved from https://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/default/files/image/president27sclimateactionplan.pdf
In this action plan, the president lays out a brief overview of the major goals for the U.S. to follow in order to ensure a cleaner, more stable environment for future generations. By 2020, Obama has pledged that America will reduce greenhouse gas emissions by 17 percent below 2005 levels if all other major economies agree to lower their emissions as well. The rest of the plan, which consists of three main executive actions are cutting carbon pollution in America, preparing the U.S. for the impacts of climate change and leading international efforts to combat global climate change and prepare for its impacts. Ultimately this plan calls for mitigation and adaptation of the U.S. and its allies. 

The White House (2013). National Strategy for the Artic Region. Executive Officer of the President, Retrieved from https://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/default/files/docs/nat_arctic_strategy.pdf 
This document sets forth the priorities that the U.S. has in the Arctic region followed by its strategy to protects its interests. The strategy consists of three main goals, advancing U.S. security interests, pursuing responsible Arctic stewardship and strengthening international cooperation in the Arctic.  These general approaches are based upon four fundamental principles, safeguarding peace and stability, making decisions with the best available information, pursuit of innovative agreements and consult and coordination with Alaskan natives.

Tillostson, M. P. (2010). Navy Expeditionary Combat Command 15 Year Energy Strategy. Navy Expeditionary Combat Command. Retrieved from http://www.public.navy.mil/necc/hq/Documents/NECC%2015%20YEAR%20ENERGY%20STRATEGY%20PT1.pdf
This document from the NECC outlines the energy consumption goals of the U.S. Navy to meet by the FY 2025, and before. By 2020, the Navy plans to reduce fuel consumption by 15% by changing how it equipment is used; and also increase fuel efficiency of end items by 15%. For 2025, this fifteen year strategy hopes to reduce energy consumption, improve energy efficiency and increase alternative energy use in expeditionary forces. In order to do so, the Navy will; reduce the number of convoys to forward operating bases, meet energy reduction goals/mandates, reduce reliance on foreign fossil fuels, reduce greenhouse gas and other harmful exhaust emissions, implement behavioral, operational, and procedural changes, develop hardware and software for equipment to be more compatible, along with a variety of other steps. 

Vice Chief of Naval Operations (2010). U.S. Navy Climate Change Roadmap. Task Force Climate Change / Oceanographer of the Navy. Retrieved from http://www.navy.mil/navydata/documents/CCR.pdf    
Along with the Army, the U.S. Navy also put forth a climate change roadmap, outlining its plan to deal with anthropogenic climate change in the decades to come. The document also refers to climate change as an overall threat multiplier for U.S. national security. Climate change will affect the type, scope and location of future Navy missions. This roadmap outlines the Navy’s plan to observing, predicting and adapting to climate change through a variety of comprehensive action steps and desired effects for FY10-14. Although this paper does not mention climate change mitigation efforts (described in Navy’s Energy Strategy by Task Force Energy) it is intended to serve as a comparison document to the Navy’s Arctic Roadmap, released in 2009.

U.S. Army Corps. Of Engineers. (2014). Climate Change Adaptation Plan. Climate Preparedness and Resilience Steering Committee, Retrieved from
This plan was put together under the committee on Climate Preparedness and Resilience (CCPR). This plan will be updated annually in the future and is made publically available to the general public, stakeholders, policy makers and the White House staff. This plan contains descriptions of programs, policies and plans that are already being fully implemented by the Army. This plan also suggests a variety of additional actions that the USACE will take in both the short and long term future to manage climate risks and build overall resilience. Such vulnerability assessments support the identification of climate change impacts on / and risks to, mission capabilities, operations and programs.   

U.S. Department of State (2013). FY13 Climate Change Adaptation Plan. Retrieved from http://www.state.gov/documents/organization/203934.pdf
The DoS, like the DoD, recognizes the potential for climate change to be a “threat multiplier” for U.S. national security. As a lead institution for the conduct of American diplomacy, the DoS’s plan highlights the importance of rapid and effective action, even before all information is fully gathered and analyzed, to address the global challenges of climate change. The DoS therefore plans to full a crucial leadership role for the rest of developing nations to follow in terms of strengthening resilience among the most vulnerable of countries to climate change through one on one partnerships.

USCENTCOM (2014). Climate Change Assessment. Retrieved from http://web.ornl.gov/sci/knowledgediscovery/QDR/docs/USCENTCOM_Climate_Change_Assessment.pdf
The U.S. Central Command explains the ability that climate change has to exacerbate hazards I certain climatic conditions around the globe. This brief gives military insight into the many effects climate change will have on increasing the number and scale of a variety of natural occurrences from heat waves and wildfires to floods and typhoons, both regionally and globally. Ultimately this document further explains why climate change is such a large threat multiplier to U.S. national security/interests.

Wolfenbarger, J. C. (2013). Strategic Plan 2013. Air Force Material Command, Retrieved from,
Four the next three to five years, this documented is intended to guide Air Force command’s actions. This plan provides a strategic context and guidance to influence the Agile Combat Support Core Function lead Integrator’s (ACS CFLI) heads both in the near and long term. Under this plan, some of the priorities of the Air Force are to continue strengthening the Air Force nuclear enterprise, modernize air and space inventories, organization and training, and recapture question excellence. All these priorities fall under three main missions, winning the fight, strengthening the team and shaping the future.

Wuebbles, D. J. (2014). Potential effects of climate change on global security. Environmental system Decision, 34, 564-577.  
The article makes clear that climate change exacerbates other stressors or, in other words, is a threat multiplier. The main focus of this paper is to look into the future of climate change with varying predictions of how it could affect both national and global security.

 

 



1 comment: